Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.
Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA
The Mockingbird Foundation is a non-profit organization founded by Phish fans in 1996 to generate charitable proceeds from the Phish community.
And since we're entirely volunteer – with no office, salaries, or paid staff – administrative costs are less than 2% of revenues! So far, we've distributed over $2 million to support music education for children – hundreds of grants in all 50 states, with more on the way.
Though I think you're wrong, I respect your point of view. I've enjoyed a lot of 3.0 Phish, though little of it touched Phish in its heyday. You may think that's being subjective, but most people who know Phish 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 agree with me.
Happy New Year
Its a very subjective truth (and a quite arrogant one at that.)
You want to have your opinion fine -- but don't tell us that disagree with you we are WRONG -- art is subjective, get over yourself.
It may not be the deep grooves of 97 or the intense Tweezer sets of 95 but if some of my favorite sets of all-time Phish have been in 2012.
And with Sand Light and Ghost on the table (never mind BoF, YEM, Alumini Blues...)...I feel tonight may be a NYE show to remember.[/quote]